|
|
 |
|
|
| Barack Obama v. National Rifle Association (NRA) BAN GUNS |
 |
I run a small gun shop in Illinois. Between
Blagojevich and Barck Obama, we are facing a
massive disarmament. We have had to pull many
models from our inventory WITHOUT any
compensation. We have stacks of paperwork and
background checks. EVERY gunowner not only has to
carry an up to date firearm ID (FOID) which
registers personal data and serial numbers of
every gun we purchase, but now they want us to
break them into pieces just to store them.
One by one, they have successfully taken away our
right to keep and bear arms (ONLY (SARCASM) the
second ammendment to the CONSTITUTION OF THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.)
If you can't see the covert steps in the breakdown
of our freedoms, then just use Europe and
Australia as a model. We watched the government
confiscate (by tracking every available weapon's
serial number and registered owner) evry gun in
those global regions. Even the collectible
antique guns that couldn't even fire were taken,
cut in half, destroyed, and buried. Of courese,
that didn't effect the criminals because FELONS
can't buy a gun legally anyway, but it did disarm
the masses.
Please educate yourself before you let Barack
Hussein Obama legally disarm our people by doing
away with the Second Ammendment to the
Constitution of the United States of America!
Barack Obama's Ten Point Plan To "Change" The
Second Amendment
1. Ban use of firearms for home defense.
2. Pass Federal laws eliminating your
Right-To-Carry.
3. Ban the manufacture,sale and possession of
handguns.
4. Close down 90% of the gun shops in America.
5. Ban rifle ammunition commonly used for hunting
and sport shooting.
6. Increase federal taxes on gun and ammunition by
500 percent.
7. Restore voting rights for five million
criminals including those who have been convicted
of using a gun to commit a violent crime.
8. Expand the Clinton semit-auto ban to include
millions more firearms.
9. Mandate a government-issued license to purchase
a firearm.
10. Appoint judges to the U.S. Supreme Court and
Federal judiciary who share his views on the
Second Amendment.
Sarah Palin is a lifetime NRA member.
Vice President vp John McCain RNC republican
national convention speech 2008 election reality
check
Tags : 2nd second ammendment constitutional RIGHTS NRA national rifle association Palin Alaska |
|
Affichage : 3796
Durée : 174 s |
| NRA: The Untold Story of Gun Confiscation After Katrina |
 |
The video you will see on this web site is
horrifying. The crimes committed against
law-abiding gun owners are beyond comprehension.
The arrogance of anti-gun politicians and
government officials and their hate of freedom
will churn your stomach.
The law is the law, the Constitution is the
Constitution. If ONE local mayor or police chief
can decide what the Second Amendment means, it
opens the door to tyranny—where ANY mayor or
police chief can say what the Second Amendment
means.
You've seen this brand of abuse of freedom in the
history books—in the pages about days of gun
confiscations leading to the terror of Stalin, Mao
and Hitler. But you'd never in a million years
think it could happen in America.
Well, it can and it did. And it will happen again
unless we take action today.
New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin, Police Superintendent
P. Eddie Compass unleashed a wave of confiscations
with these chilling words:
"No one will be able to be armed. We will take all
weapons. Only law enforcement will be allowed to
have guns."
Thousands of firearms were then confiscated from
law-abiding gun owners. The police gave no
paperwork or receipts for those guns. They just
stormed in and seized them.
With your help we're going to make the first time
in New Orleans the LAST time in America. Thank
you!
Now, one year later, these crimes against gun
owners have snowballed into a far greater threat
to our freedoms.
Even though NRA secured a court order demanding
their immediate and unconditional return, almost
every single confiscated firearm remains locked in
government trailers.
With the stroke of a pen, Mayor Nagin and Police
Superintendent Compass are getting away with
"murder"—a savaging of the second, fourth and
fourteenth amendments of our Constitution. And
they have put America on notice that they're going
to keep seizing lawfully owned guns under any
pretense.
New Orleans gun owners are showing up at these
trailers, with serial numbers of their firearms,
expecting Mayor Nagin and his band of anti-gunners
to respect the Federal courts.
They are met by stony-eyed bureaucrats who say
serial numbers aren't enough—and that gun owners
now need PROOF OF PURCHASE of these firearms.
How many of those gun owners do you think had
original receipts for those firearms? And even if
they did, how many do you think could find those
receipts in the wreckage of a hurricane?
Many of these firearms were passed down from
father to son, generation to generation. Some are
precious heirlooms. Some are collector's pieces
won in our wars. And they were all lawfully owned
and they must be returned to their owners.
With your help we're going to make the first time
in New Orleans the LAST time in America. Thank
you!
https://membership.nrahq.org/forms/donate.asp?Camp
aignID=neveragain
Tags : NRA Hurricane Katrina Gun Control Second Amendment Disaster New Orleans self defense right to bear arms handgun rifle |
|
Affichage : 423924
Durée : 468 s |
| NRA: To See Where Gun Licensing Leads, Look To England |
 |
England's increasingly repressive firearms laws
often are praised by those who would restrict the
American right to arms, so it is important to
realize that those firearms laws, which now
prohibit the private possession of handguns, rest
heavily on one foundation--the British gun owner
licensing system. The right to keep and bear arms
had been alive in England for eight centuries when
Parliament enacted the Pistols Act of 1903. The
Act, which prohibited the sale of pistols to
minors and felons, also dictated that pistols
could be sold only to those who possessed a gun
license. Since the license could be obtained at a
post office with only the payment of a fee, and
since no license was required to keep a pistol
solely in the home, there was no opposition. But
within a few short years, the licensing system had
moved from the post office to the police station.
Suddenly, Britons who wanted to own handguns--or
rifles--had to prove they had "good reason" for
receiving a police permit. Shotguns were
considered "sporting" and were exempted from
licensing requirements until 1967.
Anti-gun lobbyists in the United States have
called for a "needs-based licensing" system and
some politicians have lined up to do their
bidding.
Is licensing gun owners a good idea? After all,
"we license people to drive cars don't we?" If
requiring gun owners to obtain a government
license seems like a harmless idea to you, you may
want to know about "Firearms Form 101." That's the
"Application For A Firearms Certificate" that must
be filled out by Britons in order to purchase a
rifle or muzzleloading handgun. A separate form is
required for a "shotgun certificate."
Section 27 of the Firearms Act of 1968 (as amended
by the 1997 Act) requires a chief officer of the
Police Firearms Licensing Department to be
satisfied that the applicant is "fit to be
entrusted with a firearm." (Emphasis added) As the
applicant, you must provide:
* Your home address for the last three years.
* Your occupation and business address.
* Information about previous convictions,
including traffic violations.
* Information about any history of Epilepsy.
* Information about past treatment for drug
use, depression or nervous disorders.
* The name of your doctor, and permission for
the police to search your medical records to
obtain "factual details" about your medical
history.
* A list of the firearms you already own,
including caliber, type, maker's name and serial
number.
* A list of the ammunition you already own,
including caliber and quantity.
* A list of the firearms you wish to purchase,
stating the reason for wanting to purchase them
and where you plan on shooting or hunting with
them.
* A list of the maximum amount of ammunition
you wish to possess at any one time, by caliber.
* A list of the maximum amount of ammunition
you plan to purchase at any one time, by caliber.
* An address where the guns will be stored,
for possible future inspection.
* Information about whether you have
previously held a firearms certificate, or a
shotgun certificate.
* A letter signed by the secretary of your
shooting club or each landowner where you plan to
hunt attesting to the fact that you have
permission to shoot at those locations.
* Four passport size photos of yourself.
* A fee of L56 (approximately $90).
As an applicant, you must also designate two
"referees" who will fill out a reference form
regarding your character. This form will never be
shown to you even though it weighs heavily in the
final decision to approve or deny the application.
The "referees" must:
* Have known you for at least the last two
years.
* Not be a member of your family, a firearms
dealer, a police officer or a police employee.
* Be of "good character."
* Sign the application form declaring that it
has been answered truthfully.
* Sign and date the back of one of your
passport photos attesting that it is an accurate
representation of you at that time.
* Explain in what capacity they have known
you.
* Indicate if they are members of a shooting
club, and if so their license number and role in
the club.
* Provide their "opinion as to the applicant's
suitability to possess firearms."
* Provide information on your personal
history, including any history of emotional
problems, mental or physical disabilities and
explain how knowledge of the information was
gained.
* Explain any difficulties you have with
members of your family which "may give cause for
concern given that a firearm or ammunition may be
available in the household."
* Explain their knowledge of your experience
with firearms.
* Explain their knowledge of your attitude
toward firearms.
* Be subjected to a background check and allow
personal information to be held on a police
computer.
These measures have put Draconian regulations on
the law-abiding gun owners of Great Britain and
done little to reduce crime. On Jan. 16, 2000, the
London Times published an article about the
increase in gun crimes, and bemoaning the fact
that there are an estimated three million
unregistered guns in the nation. Besides
confirming the inescapable fact that criminals
don't bother to license their guns, the article
stated that fatal shootings in London more than
doubled between 1998 and 1999, and overall armed
crime rose 10%.
So, if licensing honest gun owners doesn't reduce
crime--and how could it?--what is the real
purpose? For British gun owners, the answer came
too late, when the government that licensed them
finally decreed that they were not "fit to be
entrusted" to own handguns for any reason. Gun
owners in the U.S. cannot plead ignorance--here
the true purpose of licensing gun owners was
defined nearly a quarter-century ago by the first
Chair of Handgun Control, Inc. "Our ultimate
goal," Pete Shields said, is "to make the the
possession of all handguns and handgun ammunition
. . . totally illegal ("The New Yorker , July 26,
1976)
Tags : NRA self defense right to arms firearm gun England |
|
Affichage : 109753
Durée : 641 s |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
